I'll admit that I'm not that "in the know" about all of the female contraception options. But I know what my sisters have said about some of the things, particularly Plan B. And they say, "what about..."
Rape.
This may be rather rare, but I have a female relative, single, hormone issues. Not needing daily birth control, also not a great option with the hormone problems to have the pill daily affecting her hormones. Becoming pregnant would be very dangerous for her because of the hormones and other reasons. She doesn't work at HL, but assume she did. May it never, ever happen, but what if she got raped. Despite the denial by some, a woman can get pregnant from being raped just once.
Now what? For the sake of her own survival, she will likely go for Plan B, ASAP. Since HL has rigged it to be certain that insurance pays nothing, she will pay out-of-pocket. So far, it doesn't seem like a big deal, except she's waiting for her prescription and a single coworker of hers at HL, Johnny Player comes in and gets his $80 worth of Viagra for $20. On the one hand, this HL insurance deal endorses Johnny's playing. On the other hand, it punishes a rape victim. And it's not just the cost of the coverage, it's the moral judgment. HL refuses coverage for moral reasons and consequently, anyone that uses Plan B is "immoral". As if surviving rape isn't challenging enough, these victims get victimized again.
So in the black/white view of HL corporation, the 'moral' thing is for the victim to reject Plan B and if pregnancy occurs, then carry the child. Switching to the case of a healthy woman that's pregnant because of rape, she would now be noticably pregnant at work. Although it's really nobody else's business in a workplace, everybody knows everyone else's marriage or dating status, from what I've experienced. If this corporation is as fundy as it appears, pregnant single women are whores. So, does this woman need to explain to everyone at work that she was raped, maybe include in on her HL name tag? And if this corporation is as fundy as it appears, they would expect her to put the baby up for adoption (to a proper fundy family) because a single mom can't make a proper home for a child. That's a tough and terrible decision for a woman if she gets to this point. Even though conceived from rape, the baby is hers and has been with her for months. Indeed, a tough situation. And to this point, HL morally said that she should have the baby if she was raped... they'll take responsibility for that decision. But will they put their HL money where their corporate mouth is? Are they going to help pay for raising the child? Of course not, that was the "mother's personal decision to have a child"... that's the fundy way... A fetus is sacred and they'll do everything they can to make sure it's born. But once it's born, they lose interest in it's well-being. They'll fight against gvt funding for children's healthcare, public education, etc.
Returning to the example of my relative. The doctors had explained that she would likely have terrible health problems before eventually losing the fetus. Would HL be understanding through this entire ordeal, giving the time off needed and covering all the medical expenses? Will she have to explain all the painful details of her private life in order to try to save her job?
Am I using a too specific example? Am I projecting too much of my JW history on HL corporation? From what little I've paid attention to this case, it seems the majority of the judges took a very broad swipe that favored a narrow religious view held by the boss, but ignored the painful realities and hard choices of real life for the employee.